This website is part of an independent public-interest effort gathering reports from the public for a potential class action and consumer-protection review.

Were you harmed by

Bedford Dental Group

in Beverly Hills, CA?

This web site is part of a public-interest effort collecting factual reports from individuals who feel they were individually harmed by alleged misconduct involving Bedford Dental Group "BDG" (436 N. Bedford Dr., Suite 300, Beverly Hills, CA 90210; www.bhdentists.com) and its associates. It describes itself as (taken from its public web site): "Bedford Dental Group is a premier cosmetic and restorative dental practice in Beverly Hills, led by Dr. Daniel Naysan. We offer personalized dental care, including veneers, implants, smile makeovers, and general dentistry, trusted by celebrities and patients alike."
Public records show Bedford Dental Group is a fictitious name used by Daniel E. Naysan, D.D.S., Mehdi Nayssan, D.D.S., and M. Nayssan D.D.S., Inc. Submissions may and can be used for legal, consumer-protection and journalistic research. This site is not a law firm, offers no legal advice, and is unaffiliated with Bedford Dental Group.

In event of any legal action, any recovery is not guaranteed.

PLEASE DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURTS OR THE COURTS' CLERK'S OFFICE TO INQUIRE ABOUT EXISTING LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST BEDFORD DENTAL GROUP AND DANIEL NAYSAN DDS.

Report your experience

Your identity will remain private unless you opt-in to contact. Fields marked * are required.

Save this ID to your records to track your submission.

YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION

YOUR EXPERIENCE REPORT

Which doctor(s) did you see? *

Select all that apply. You may verify your provider's license here: Dental Board of California License Search

Please avoid sharing sensitive identifiers (SSN, full DOB). Month/Year is sufficient.

You may upload up to three (3) attachments: Images only in JPEG, PNG format. File size must not exceed 5MB limit.

CONSENT
Encrypted in transit · You can request deletion later.
By using this website or submitting a form, you agree that your participation is voluntary and that data provided may be reviewed solely for informational or consumer-protection purposes.

Frequently Asked Questions


Who can submit a report?
Any current or former patient of Bedford Dental Group or Dr. Daniel Naysan, DDS. Reports are accepted from patients treated at 436 N Bedford Dr Suite 300, Beverly Hills, CA 90210, or affiliated offices.
Is this website part of a lawsuit or a law firm?
No. This site operates independently as a public-interest intake portal. It does not represent any law firm, attorney, or official court proceeding.
Will my information be public?
No. Submissions are confidential and are never published with identifying details without explicit written consent.
Will an attorney contact me?
If you opt-in, your submission may be shared for review by licensed counsel or regulators. There is no guarantee of representation.
Can I attach documents or photos?
Yes. Only if you own the photos and have the legal rights to distribute them.
How is my data protected and how long is it kept?
Submissions are transmitted over an encrypted connection and stored securely. You may request deletion at any time. Unless deleted earlier at your request, records may be retained up to 3 years.
Can I report anonymously?
We need your name, contact details enables follow-up verification if needed. Anonymous reports are still reviewed.
What is the purpose of this form?
To document patient and witness accounts regarding treatment experiences at Bedford Dental Group, helping identify potential patterns for consumer-protection review and also supports any current or future legal action taken to protect the public.

Potential Class Action Lawsuit

This page summarizes consumer theories of liability suitable for coordinated action and the core elements for class certification under California procedure. We are not a law firm or an attorney. However, theories and submissions may be reviewed by attorneys non-retained and/or retained at any time in review for any class action viability. You may, at your own decision decide if you feel that any of the below theories are or may be applicable to your experience with Bedford Dental Group.

I. Potential Class Action Theories

A. Unnecessary Dental Treatment Class

Proposed class: All Bedford Dental Group patients who, within four years, were recommended or charged for periodontal, root canal, veneer, or related procedures later determined unnecessary by another provider.

  • Claims: CLRA, UCL, Fraud, Negligent Misrepresentation.
  • Conduct: Uniform scripts that presented optional cosmetic work as necessary treatment.
  • Relief: Restitution of overcharges, injunctive relief, fees, and costs.

B. False Advertising and Endorsement Class

Proposed class: Consumers exposed to advertisements or marketing claims that overstated quality, necessity, or celebrity endorsement to induce services.

  • Statutes: UCL, FAL, CLRA.
  • Conduct: Use of promotional statements that could mislead a reasonable consumer.
  • Relief: Injunction removing or correcting ads and restitution of consultation or cosmetic fees tied to the ads.

C. Billing and Insurance Practices Class

Proposed class: Patients billed for procedures not performed or upcoded services such as comprehensive periodontal therapy when only routine cleaning was provided.

  • Theories: UCL, FAL, CLRA, common law fraud.
  • Proof focus: Insurer EOBs, CDT code patterns, ledgers, and appointment logs.
  • Relief: Restitution to patients, disgorgement, injunctive relief.

D. Unauthorized or Unconsented Procedures Class

Proposed class: Patients treated by non disclosed specialists or assistants without informed written consent for the specific procedure.

  • Theories: Battery, lack of informed consent, UCL.
  • Records sought: Signed consent forms by procedure and provider, staffing schedules, and referral agreements.

E. Records and Evidence Handling Class

Proposed class: Patients whose x rays, study models, or consent documents were withheld, incomplete, or inconsistently produced.

  • Theories: Statutory access rights, UCL.
  • Relief: Injunction compelling production and compliance, statutory remedies where applicable.

II. Class Action Viability

Core certification elements and how they are satisfied on a consumer record developed from public reviews, marketing materials, and billing data.

ElementShowingSupporting Proof
NumerosityPublic reviews and records indicate a large affected population, making joinder impracticable.Aggregated Yelp and other consumer reviews, insurer data, patient rosters subject to protective order.
CommonalityCommon questions around uniform marketing, necessity representations, and billing practices.Standardized consult forms, scripts, website claims, and CDT coding patterns.
TypicalityNamed representatives experienced the same conduct and injuries as the class.Unnecessary treatment recommendations, billing for procedures not performed, lack of consent.
AdequacyPlaintiffs can fairly and adequately protect class interests with experienced counsel.Retention of counsel with consumer and healthcare litigation experience.
PredominanceLiability turns on uniform practices that outweigh individual damages issues.Centralized proof of marketing, intake, and billing practices suitable for classwide adjudication.
SuperiorityClass treatment is superior to individual suits for relatively modest per patient losses.Judicial economy, consistent injunctive relief, and restitution calculations from business records.
This site is informational and not a solicitation or legal advice. Not a law firm. Submissions on this site are voluntary.
This website is an independent consumer information and intake portal created in public interest. It is not a law firm, and the operator is not an attorney. Nothing here constitutes legal, medical, or professional advice. Submitting information does not create an attorney-client relationship or guarantee representation.
All information published here is believed to be derived from public sources, court filings, or voluntary submissions. The site operator makes no warranties regarding completeness or outcome and may edit or remove submissions for privacy, accuracy, or compliance. By using this website or submitting a form, you agree that your participation is voluntary and that data provided may be reviewed solely for informational or consumer-protection purposes.
Terms, Disclaimer, Privacy Policy. · © www.bhdentistsvictims.com. All rights reserved.